Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jessica Skrobarczyk's avatar

I’ve been grappling a lot with the question of Paul, who quite frankly comes across as extremely decentered in many of his letters.

I think this is a good detailing of many contradictions between what Paul wrote and the teachings of Jesus in the gospel, but I also think it's important to remember that the gospels were written decades after Paul's letters and almost certainly after he had died. It's also important to remember that Paul almost certainly thought the apocolypse was coming in his lifetime. And that Paul did not know Jesus in his lifetime. Paul adopted Christianity and decided to become a leader in it only after Jesus had died--prior to that he was prosecuting Christians himself.

I think the gospels have far more spiritual value than Paul's letters, I think including Paul's letters in the canonical bible is a questionable choice at best (especially without including key historical context around them), but we can't truly judge Paul as "contradicting" teachings that did not yet exist in a coherent, unified form.

I think every Christian should study biblical history, it helps a lot in cutting through the more toxic modern iterations (most of which is built on Paul's writings). But even the gospels themselves benefit from a critical eye and historical context, written by anonymous authors so long after Jesus' death.

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?